Discover
Find the routineWe identify where employees lose time: searching, standard emails, instructions and materials.


Business automation → AI assistants for the team
AI assistant for employees: search across policies and documents, drafts of emails and materials, role-based access. Implemented in Kazakhstan in Russian and Kazakh.
Discuss your projectOverview
Gotomarket implements AI assistants for teams in Kazakhstan. The assistant finds answers in internal documents, helps prepare emails and materials, and shows the source of each answer. The result: less time spent on searching and routine work, faster onboarding and access to knowledge without digging through chats.
Solution architecture
We start with one recurring task where the team loses time and expand the scenario only after its value is proven.
We identify where employees lose time: searching, standard emails, instructions and materials.
We define the documents, access rights, answer rules and quality criteria.
We connect document storage, role-based access, a query log and source links.
We test the assistant in one department and measure time saved and answer quality.
We add departments and tasks based on feedback and proven results.
Unit economics and ROI
The economics come from the time employees spend searching and writing repetitive texts. In a hypothetical example, a 10-person department spends about 200 hours a month on such work.
If the assistant cuts routine work by 30–40%, the team frees up 60–80 hours a month. Actual results depend on document quality, task frequency and how readily employees adopt the tool.
Result
After the pilot you keep a working tool, prepared knowledge and clear rules for access and further development.
Comparison of approaches
The tools differ in how complete the answer is and what they require from source documents.
| Approach | What it does | Limitation | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folder search | Finds a file by name | Doesn't compose an answer | Few documents with a clear structure |
| Knowledge base search | Finds matches in the text | Requires manual reading | Sources are well organized |
| AI assistant | Prepares an answer and shows the source | Needs roles and quality control | Many recurring requests |
Limitations and risks
An assistant pays off where knowledge is organized and tasks repeat.
If knowledge isn't collected and kept up to date, the sources need to be put in order first.
Where every request needs a fresh expert judgment, automating search adds little value.
With one or two employees, the time saved may not justify implementation and support.
A good fit
Not a fit
Frequently asked questions
No. Permissions are assigned by role, and queries and answers can be logged for oversight.
No. It takes over the mechanical part: searching and drafting. Decisions and expert judgment stay with the employee.
Policies, instructions, knowledge bases, documents in Google Drive or Notion and other accessible storage.
A pilot in one department usually takes 2–4 weeks: preparing sources, setting up roles and testing on real tasks.
The cost depends on the number and condition of the sources, the number of roles and departments, and the integrations required. We start with a pilot in one department on one recurring task. We provide an estimate after auditing the documents and access rights.
Yes. The assistant can find tasks and their descriptions, prepare project summaries and draft new tasks from task tracker data while respecting user permissions. Actions that change data, such as creating or moving a task, are carried out only after the employee confirms them. The exact set of actions is agreed during the pilot.
Yes, if managers need to quickly find a customer's history and deal terms, or draft an email based on CRM context. The assistant gets access only to approved fields and shows which record the answer comes from. Sensitive data can be excluded from the setup entirely.
Safety depends on the architecture: which sources are connected, who has access to them, where the data is stored and what terms the model provider sets. Before launch we define the list of approved documents, the roles and query logging. Documents that must not go to external services stay outside the setup, or we choose a suitable hosting option.
Yes. Typical tasks include searching technical documentation and the support knowledge base, drafting replies to customers, writing release notes and onboarding new developers and managers. The effect is stronger when documentation and tasks in the tracker are kept up to date.
