Discover
Analyze the flowWe measure request types, handling time, repeat requests and first-line bottlenecks.


Business automation → Support automation
AI support automation: request classification and routing, conversation summaries, agent suggestions and SLA control. Implemented in Kazakhstan in Russian and Kazakh.
Discuss your projectOverview
Gotomarket automates customer support with AI in Kazakhstan. The system classifies and routes requests, prepares conversation summaries and agent suggestions, and helps you keep SLAs under control. The result: a lighter load on first-line support, faster replies and transparent quality in Russian and Kazakh.
Solution architecture
We start with the most frequent request types and expand automation only after quality is verified and handoff to an agent works safely.
We measure request types, handling time, repeat requests and first-line bottlenecks.
We design classification, routing, SLAs and the conditions for handing off to an agent.
We connect channels, the knowledge base and the helpdesk, and set up suggestions and summaries.
We switch on automation for part of the flow and monitor speed and quality.
We add standard replies and scenarios based on statistics and feedback.
Unit economics and ROI
The economics rest on reducing manual workload and repeat requests. In a hypothetical example with 2,000 requests a month and 6 minutes of handling each, first-line support spends about 200 hours a month.
If AI cuts manual workload by 30–50%, that frees up 60–100 hours. The actual effect depends on the share of routine requests, the quality of the knowledge base and the current cost of handling.
Result
The pilot covers one measurable area of support and leaves you control rules for further expansion.
Comparison of approaches
We choose the level of automation based on the risk of error and how repetitive the requests are.
| Approach | Role of AI | Limitation | When it fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Routing | Identifies the topic and queue | Doesn't resolve the customer's issue | Multiple support tiers |
| Agent suggestion | Drafts the reply and summary | A person stays in every conversation | Complex or sensitive requests |
| Auto-reply | Resolves a routine request | Requires a solid knowledge base and escalation | High volume of repetitive requests |
Limitations and risks
Automation pays off when there is a steady flow of repetitive requests and clear rules for answering them.
With a few dozen requests a month, manual support can be cheaper and more flexible.
If there are almost no routine scenarios, classification and auto-replies will have little effect.
Without verified answers, you first need to collect and maintain the sources.
A good fit
Not a fit
Frequently asked questions
Only in agreed routine scenarios. Complex and sensitive cases are handed to an agent with full context.
Through a test set of questions, SLA rules, a reply log, escalation and analytics on request causes.
Yes. We check the quality of the Kazakh version with native speakers and on real requests.
With one frequent request type that has a clear handling cost, not with all of support at once.
The cost depends on the volume and structure of the ticket flow, the number of channels, the state of the knowledge base and the integrations with the helpdesk and CRM. We start with a pilot on the most frequent request type with a clear handling cost. We provide an estimate after analyzing the flow and current first-line metrics.
Usually not. We connect to your current helpdesk, CRM and channels via API and build classification, summaries and suggestions into the interface agents already use. If the system cannot support the required scenario, we discuss options before the start rather than during implementation.
For IT products, AI detects that a request looks like a bug, prepares a summary with reproduction steps and customer data, and creates a task in Jira or Plane. The task status flows back to the ticket so the agent can tell the customer about the fix. Rules for creating tasks and merging similar requests are agreed in advance.
Tickets are linked to the customer record in the CRM, and conversation summaries are saved to its history. Account managers see customer issues before a renewal or upsell, and support sees deal terms and status. Sync is set up only for the agreed fields.
First response and resolution time, SLA compliance, the share of tickets closed without an agent, the escalation rate, repeat contacts and answer quality scores. We record baseline values before launch to compare the pilot fairly with the original process. The decision to expand is based on this data.
