Discover
Define the contextWe capture critical scenarios, the cost of downtime, growth plans, data requirements and the decision the audit must support.


Product development → Technical product audit
We audit architecture, code, data, security, infrastructure and development processes, and turn technical risks into business priorities.
Discuss your projectOverview
A working product may depend on a single developer, lack observability or only handle the current load. The point of an audit is not an abstract code quality score but a decision: scale, change the team, prepare for a deal or reduce risk.
Solution architecture
First we capture the business context, then we analyze the system and link every finding to a decision and a priority.
We capture critical scenarios, the cost of downtime, growth plans, data requirements and the decision the audit must support.
We set the scope: architecture, code, dependencies, security, reliability, infrastructure and development process.
We review repositories, configuration, environments, metrics and access rights, and talk to the team.
We link each finding to cost, speed, business dependency and the expected effort to fix it.
We prepare an executive summary and a remediation backlog with dependencies and the order of work.
Unit economics and ROI
An audit reduces the risk of spending budget on scaling a system that won't handle growth, or of starting an expensive rewrite without clear priorities.
Management gets an independent picture before a team change, deal, integration or major release. The result is a planned sequence of investments instead of reacting to incidents.
Result
Deliverables are split into a management view and a technical action plan.
Comparison of approaches
The right format depends on whether the cause of the product's limitations is confirmed.
| Approach | What it gives | Main risk | When it fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fix individual symptoms | Quick local improvement | Missing the systemic cause | The risk is already clear |
| Rewrite the system | New technology stack | Losing working logic and budget | Limitations are proven |
| Technical audit | An independent risk map | Requires access and team involvement | The priority and scale of the problem are unclear |
Limitations and risks
How deep the conclusions go depends directly on the quality of access and context.
A presentation only lets us check the declared architecture, not the actual state of the code and infrastructure.
The audit does not replace specialized penetration testing or industry certification.
First we capture an independent picture. Implementation is a separate stage.
A good fit
Not a fit
Frequently asked questions
No. The technical part is for the team, while the executive summary translates risks into the language of cost and business dependency.
Yes. Technical due diligence focuses on ownership and scaling risks and on the product's claimed capabilities.
For priority work we give a complexity range and dependencies. A precise estimate comes after planning.
Through an NDA, minimum necessary access and an agreed scope for working with code and data.
The cost depends on the size of the system, the number of components and integrations, the depth of review in each area and how quickly access is provided. An audit before a deal or scaling usually requires wider coverage than a review of one problem area. We provide an estimate after defining the business context and the decision the audit must support.
The timeline depends on the volume of code and infrastructure, the number of areas reviewed and how quickly the team provides access and time for interviews. Timelines are agreed before the start together with the review map. If the audit is needed by a specific date, for example for a deal, we narrow the focus to the most critical risks.
Read access to repositories, configuration, environments, monitoring and documentation, plus time from key team members for interviews. From the business side, we need context: critical scenarios, growth plans and the decision to be made. Access is limited to the minimum necessary and covered by an NDA.
Yes, this is one of the most common situations. The audit records the state of the code, documentation, infrastructure and access, reveals areas that depend on specific people and helps plan the handover. The new team gets a clear picture of the risks instead of starting with guesswork.
Yes, the development process is part of the audit. We look at how a task moves from creation in Jira or Plane to release, how review and testing are organized, how often releases ship and where delays build up. This helps explain slow and unpredictable releases, not just code quality.
