Discover
Map the processWe document the event, system owners, source of truth, data, statuses and manual exceptions.


Product development → API and service integration
We design and implement API integrations with CRM, ERP, payments, maps and external services: data, statuses, error handling, monitoring and documentation.
Discuss your projectOverview
A successful API response doesn't mean the process works. Services go down, messages get duplicated, statuses drift apart, and staff can't tell whether an operation went through. We design integrations with data owners, error-handling rules, observability and a clear recovery path.
Solution architecture
We start with the event in business terms and only then choose the technical design.
We document the event, system owners, source of truth, data, statuses and manual exceptions.
We choose between synchronous calls and a queue, and define idempotency, versioning, access and recovery rules.
We connect test environments, build the integration and automated checks for critical scenarios.
We test timeouts, duplicate notifications, bad data, permission changes and external service outages.
We add logs, metrics, alerts, a runbook and a process for keeping up with external contract changes.
Unit economics and ROI
The financial impact shows up where staff manually move data, check statuses and fix mismatches between systems. Integration cuts rework and makes exceptions visible.
At low volumes, a manual operation can still be the smarter choice. So before development we estimate how often the event occurs, the cost of an error and the cost of maintaining the integration.
Results
The working integration is handed over together with tests, access credentials and operating instructions.
Comparison of approaches
The architecture depends on how urgently a response is needed and whether reprocessing is acceptable.
| Approach | Strength | Limitation | When it fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manual operation | Flexibility with exceptions | Errors and labor costs | Very small volume |
| Synchronous integration | Immediate response | Dependency on service availability | The user is waiting for the result |
| Event queue | Resilience and retries | Status is harder to track | Background and bulk operations |
Limitations and risks
Automation locks in the rules of a process. If there are no rules, it locks in chaos.
First, the business logic and decision owners need to stabilize.
Before integrating, we define the source of truth and fix data quality.
A safe manual operation can be cheaper than a complex technical setup.
A good fit
Not a fit
Frequently asked questions
We look at official exchange options and at changing the process. We consider fragile workarounds only with a clear understanding of the risk.
Where possible, we separate business logic from the external interface so the cost of switching stays predictable.
The project includes a stabilization period. Ongoing monitoring and an SLA are agreed separately.
Yes. Together we agree on the contract, code review, testing and each side's responsibilities.
The cost depends on the number of systems and events, the quality of the API documentation, the availability of test environments and the error-handling and monitoring requirements. One-way data transfer is simpler than two-way status synchronization. We give an estimate after the process is described and the external services' capabilities are checked.
The timeline depends on the number of systems, the complexity of the status model and the availability of test environments from external services. Agreeing on the source of truth and testing failure scenarios usually take longer than the code itself. We estimate the timeline after describing the process and reviewing the documentation.
Yes. Typical scenarios include passing website leads, syncing contacts, creating deals and updating payment statuses. Before development we define which system owns each field, how duplicates are handled and what an employee does when something fails.
For example, when a deal reaches a certain stage in the CRM, a project or onboarding task is automatically created in Jira or Plane, and the progress status flows back to the customer record. Sales sees the work progress, and the team sees the deal terms. We agree in advance which fields sync and in which direction.
Ready-made connectors quickly handle simple flows with low volume and a low cost of error. Payments, orders and critical statuses need idempotency, retries, monitoring and clear recovery, which are easier to control in a custom integration. A combination often works best: a connector for simple tasks and a separate setup for critical ones.
