Product development → API and service integration

API integrations

We design and implement API integrations with CRM, ERP, payments, maps and external services: data, statuses, error handling, monitoring and documentation.

Discuss your project

Overview

API integration: what the service is

A successful API response doesn't mean the process works. Services go down, messages get duplicated, statuses drift apart, and staff can't tell whether an operation went through. We design integrations with data owners, error-handling rules, observability and a clear recovery path.

Systems
CRM · ERP · payments · API
Foundation
the business event and source of truth
Control
statuses, errors and monitoring
Deliverable
integration and runbook
In plain words

What it is and why it matters

What it is
We set up automatic data exchange between your CRM, accounting, payment and external systems. Orders, statuses and payments flow on their own, and failures are visible and fixed by procedure.
Who it is for
Companies where staff copy orders and statuses between systems by hand, and a mistake or delay already affects customers and revenue.
What you get
A working, tested integration, a map of which data goes where and which system is the master, failure monitoring with alerts, and a step-by-step guide for incidents.
Where to start
Describe the process that is still manual: which systems are involved and where data gets lost. We will assess whether automating it pays off and suggest a format.

Solution architecture

How we implement an integration

We start with the event in business terms and only then choose the technical design.

01

Discover

Map the process

We document the event, system owners, source of truth, data, statuses and manual exceptions.

02

Design

Design the contract

We choose between synchronous calls and a queue, and define idempotency, versioning, access and recovery rules.

03

Deploy

Build and test

We connect test environments, build the integration and automated checks for critical scenarios.

04

Drive

Roll out a limited flow

We test timeouts, duplicate notifications, bad data, permission changes and external service outages.

05

Dominate

Add observability

We add logs, metrics, alerts, a runbook and a process for keeping up with external contract changes.

Unit economics and ROI

How integration creates impact

The financial impact shows up where staff manually move data, check statuses and fix mismatches between systems. Integration cuts rework and makes exceptions visible.

At low volumes, a manual operation can still be the smarter choice. So before development we estimate how often the event occurs, the cost of an error and the cost of maintaining the integration.

What it reduces
manual data transfer
What it protects
critical operations
What we measure
errors and delays
Decision
automate or keep it manual

Results

What you get

The working integration is handed over together with tests, access credentials and operating instructions.

  • A data flow map
  • System owners and the source of truth
  • API contracts and a status model
  • A working integration
  • Tests for critical scenarios
  • Access and secrets management
  • Logging, metrics and alerts
  • Technical documentation and a runbook

Comparison of approaches

Direct connection or queue

The architecture depends on how urgently a response is needed and whether reprocessing is acceptable.

ApproachStrengthLimitationWhen it fits
Manual operationFlexibility with exceptionsErrors and labor costsVery small volume
Synchronous integrationImmediate responseDependency on service availabilityThe user is waiting for the result
Event queueResilience and retriesStatus is harder to trackBackground and bulk operations

Limitations and risks

When integration is premature

Automation locks in the rules of a process. If there are no rules, it locks in chaos.

The process changes every week

First, the business logic and decision owners need to stabilize.

The data is contradictory

Before integrating, we define the source of truth and fix data quality.

The volume is too small

A safe manual operation can be cheaper than a complex technical setup.

A good fit

When this service is a good fit

  • Data is regularly moved by hand
  • Several systems are involved in one process
  • An error or delay affects customers and revenue
  • You need monitoring and a clear recovery path

Not a fit

When to choose another approach

  • The process is still changing all the time
  • There's no agreed source of truth
  • The operation happens very rarely
  • The systems have no reliable official way to exchange data

Terms in plain words

API
an agreed way for systems to exchange data
Source of truth
the system whose data is treated as the master copy
Idempotency
a repeated request does not create a second order or payment
Queue
a way to handle the event later and retry it after an error
Runbook
instructions on what to do in case of failure
API contract
An agreed description of what data, in which format and with which statuses systems exchange. Without it, any change can break the integration.
Synchronous integration
An exchange where one system waits for an immediate reply from another. It suits cases where a user is waiting for a result, but it depends on the external service being available.
Alert
An automatic notification to the team about a failure or delay in the integration, so the problem is spotted and fixed in time.

Frequently asked questions

API and service integration: FAQ

What if a system has no API?

We look at official exchange options and at changing the process. We consider fragile workarounds only with a clear understanding of the risk.

Can we switch providers later?

Where possible, we separate business logic from the external interface so the cost of switching stays predictable.

Is post-launch support included?

The project includes a stabilization period. Ongoing monitoring and an SLA are agreed separately.

Can you work with our development team?

Yes. Together we agree on the contract, code review, testing and each side's responsibilities.

How much does an API integration cost?

The cost depends on the number of systems and events, the quality of the API documentation, the availability of test environments and the error-handling and monitoring requirements. One-way data transfer is simpler than two-way status synchronization. We give an estimate after the process is described and the external services' capabilities are checked.

How long does it take to implement an integration?

The timeline depends on the number of systems, the complexity of the status model and the availability of test environments from external services. Agreeing on the source of truth and testing failure scenarios usually take longer than the code itself. We estimate the timeline after describing the process and reviewing the documentation.

Can Twenty or amoCRM be integrated with a website, payments and an accounting system?

Yes. Typical scenarios include passing website leads, syncing contacts, creating deals and updating payment statuses. Before development we define which system owns each field, how duplicates are handled and what an employee does when something fails.

How do we connect a CRM to a task tracker like Jira or Plane?

For example, when a deal reaches a certain stage in the CRM, a project or onboarding task is automatically created in Jira or Plane, and the progress status flows back to the customer record. Sales sees the work progress, and the team sees the deal terms. We agree in advance which fields sync and in which direction.

How is a custom integration different from connectors like Make or Zapier?

Ready-made connectors quickly handle simple flows with low volume and a low cost of error. Payments, orders and critical statuses need idempotency, retries, monitoring and clear recovery, which are easier to control in a custom integration. A combination often works best: a connector for simple tasks and a separate setup for critical ones.

Product development