Discover
Map the processWe record where tasks originate, where they get lost and who makes decisions, and take stock of chats, spreadsheets and the old Jira.

Business automation → Task trackers: Jira and Plane
We set up Jira, Plane and other work management systems around how your company actually works: process audit, workflow design, migration, self-hosted deployment on servers in Kazakhstan and team training.
Discuss your projectOverview
Gotomarket moves a company's work out of chats, spreadsheets and the manager's head into one system. We map the real process, design the project and status model, configure Jira or Plane, migrate history from the old tool and launch with one team. For companies that want to keep data in Kazakhstan, we deploy Plane on their own servers. The result: tasks, deadlines and ownership are visible without chasing people in chats.
Solution architecture
We fit the tool to the process, not the process to the tool. We start with one team and scale only after the pilot has taken root.
We record where tasks originate, where they get lost and who makes decisions, and take stock of chats, spreadsheets and the old Jira.
We define projects, work item types, 4–6 statuses, roles, priority rules and the integrations that matter.
We roll out Jira Cloud or self-hosted Plane, import data and connect SSO, Git, CRM and messengers.
One team works in the system for 2–4 weeks: planning, daily rhythm, blocker reviews and fine-tuning.
We onboard the remaining teams, build management dashboards, lock in the operating rules and hand over to an owner.
Unit economics and ROI
Without a system, tasks live in WhatsApp and Telegram, statuses live in people's heads, and the manager learns about a missed deadline after the fact. Time goes to asking where a task is and who owns it instead of doing the work.
A single tracker shows workload, cycle time and bottlenecks. Moving from Jira to self-hosted Plane also removes the per-user fee. The actual effect depends on team size and the discipline we establish during the pilot.
Result
The implementation includes not only a configured tool but also the rules the team will follow inside it.
Comparison of approaches
The choice depends on team size, data residency requirements and who will maintain the system.
| Approach | What happens | Limitation | When it fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jira Cloud | Ready-made Atlassian SaaS billed per user | Data stored outside Kazakhstan, cost grows with the team | Teams built around the Atlassian ecosystem |
| Plane Cloud | Work items, cycles and wiki in one tool | Integration ecosystem younger than Jira's | Product teams of 5 to 50 people |
| Self-hosted Plane | Open source on your servers with no per-user fee | Someone must own the server and updates | Companies that must keep data in Kazakhstan |
| Tasks in the CRM | Assignments next to clients and deals | Weak model for development and releases | Sales and service teams without an IT department |
Limitations and risks
A tracker reinforces discipline that at least one manager already has. Without it, the tool becomes one more chat.
Without someone who enforces the rules, statuses stop being updated two weeks after launch.
Twenty statuses and ten work item types on day one kill any desire to use the system. We start with the minimum.
If planning and blocker reviews are not built into the team's week, the tracker turns into an archive.
A good fit
Not a fit
For dev teams
For IT companies a task tracker is the working environment of development: tasks are linked to code, releases and client requests. We build the Jira or Plane scheme around the product type and the team's rhythm, not around a vendor template.
For a SaaS team we separate work streams: roadmap features, bugs from support and technical debt. We set up sprints or cycles, link tasks to Git, add release labels and a dashboard showing how much time goes to new work and how much to fixes. Client requests from the CRM turn into tasks with a link to the account.
Mobile teams have releases tied to App Store and Google Play review, so the scheme includes versions, testing statuses and a separate stream for hotfixes. We add version, platform and device fields to the bug card so the tester and developer do not have to clarify them in chat. We also set up a release board showing what goes into the next build.
Studios run several client projects in parallel, and the key need is seeing people's workload across them. We create a project template, shared task types and statuses, and tracking of estimates and actual time. A won deal in the CRM creates a project in the tracker, and the client sees progress through a report rather than by asking the manager.
For teams where Jira does not meet data residency requirements, we offer self-hosted Plane on servers in Kazakhstan. We move projects, tasks, comments and attachments with the built-in importer, check the result against the import report and keep Jira available read-only until the pilot ends. We run the pilot with one team to catch discrepancies before the whole company moves.
Implementation practice
Implementing a task tracker is not installing software but designing rules: which tasks exist, how they move and who is responsible for what. Below are the decisions we make on every Jira or Plane implementation.
We build the status scheme from how tasks move today, not from a Scrum template. In interviews with developers, the tester and the team lead we record where a task waits, who accepts it and what counts as done. The result is 4–6 statuses with clear transition criteria and a definition of done for each task type. A common mistake is copying a twenty-status scheme from a previous company: within a month half of them are empty and tasks sit “In progress” for weeks. We add complexity only when the team itself runs into the need for it. The scheme is documented briefly so new hires understand it without explanation.
We choose Jira when the team already lives in the Atlassian ecosystem and needs complex workflows, Confluence and a broad integration catalog. Plane fits when simplicity, tasks and wiki in one tool and data storage in Kazakhstan matter. We also consider who needs access, such as contractors, clients or other departments, and which Git and CRM integrations the team already uses. And we answer upfront who will maintain the server: without an owner, self-hosting becomes a risk, so we settle this before choosing the tool, not after launch.
Jira Cloud hosts data in Atlassian regions, and Kazakhstan is not among them. If keeping data in the country matters to your company, we deploy Plane on a Kazakhstan hosting provider's server or in your own data center. We configure the domain, SSL, SSO, backups and monitoring, and document the update procedure. The owner receives a maintenance guide: what to check regularly, how to restore data from a backup and whom to contact in case of failure. If CRM or Git integrations are needed later, they connect to the same installation without moving data.
Before migration we run an inventory: which projects are active, which tasks are alive, which fields are actually filled in. Long-closed tasks usually go to an archive to keep the new system clean. Statuses and task types are mapped to the new scheme in a mapping table agreed with the team lead. From Jira we migrate with the Plane importer, from Trello and spreadsheets through import after data preparation. We verify the result by counts of tasks, comments and attachments, and switch off the old tool only after a successful pilot. Users and permissions are set up in advance so the team sees its tasks on day one.
A tracker stays alive only when it is built into the team's week. During the pilot we establish cycle planning, a short blocker review and a retrospective, plus a rule: a task without an assignee and a due date is not taken into work. For leadership we build a dashboard of workload, overdue tasks and lead time. In small Kazakhstan IT companies the business owner often makes the decisions, so the dashboard must answer “what's on fire?” without a call. Messenger notifications link to the task, so discussion does not drift back to WhatsApp or Telegram. We also agree who cleans up overdue tasks and how often, so the board does not turn into an archive.
We connect integrations based on the real process, not the catalog. Git is linked so that branches, commits and pull requests attach to the task automatically and the status changes on merge. SSO is set up so access is granted and revoked through the corporate account rather than by hand. The CRM link turns a won deal into a project and returns delivery status to the client record. For each integration we define which system is the master and test its behavior on failure. We skip unnecessary integrations: each one creates a stream of notifications the team soon learns to ignore.
Step by step
Below is what actually happens at each implementation step, who takes part on the IT company side and what you have in hand after each step.
We collect every place where tasks live today: WhatsApp and Telegram chats, spreadsheets, Trello, the old Jira. The head of development and one or two team leads take part. We look at real tasks from recent weeks rather than a process description on paper. The output is a list of task sources, a list of active projects and a clear view of what moves to the new system and what goes to the archive.
We run a working session with the team to agree on task types, statuses, definition of done, priority rules and the rhythm of sprints or cycles. Here we also decide between Jira and Plane, cloud or a server in Kazakhstan. The artifact is a document with the project and status scheme, roles, access rights and the list of integrations, agreed with the head of development. Disputed points go to the head of development right away, so we do not have to revisit them during the pilot.
We deploy or configure the tracker, create projects, task templates and dashboards, and connect Git, SSO and messengers. We migrate history using the mapping table and verify the counts of tasks, comments and attachments. On the client side an administrator or DevOps engineer takes part if the system runs on your servers. The output is a ready working environment and a migration report.
One team moves fully into the tracker: planning, daily work, blocker reviews. We attend key meetings, collect feedback and adjust statuses, fields and notifications. The main pilot rule is that tasks are no longer assigned in chats. The step ends with a corrected scheme, a list of improvements and the head's decision on bringing in the other teams. If the team works in sprints, the pilot covers at least one full sprint.
We move the remaining teams to the proven scheme and run role-based training for developers, testers and managers. We hand over working rules, administration guides and, for self-hosted setups, the backup and update procedure. The process owner on the client side gets dashboards and admin rights. A month later we hold a check-in to see which rules have stuck.
Ways to work
Launching a task tracker takes 2–6 weeks depending on the number of teams and the migration volume. For a single team of up to 20 people it is usually 2–3 weeks including the pilot.
| Format | What is included | Timeline | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single-team rollout | Process audit, status scheme, Jira or Plane setup, Git and messenger integrations, pilot, training | 2–3 weeks | The team works in the tracker by agreed rules |
| Company migration from Jira | Moving several teams, status mapping table, history import, pilot, old system shutdown | 5–7 weeks | All teams in the new system with history intact |
| Self-hosted Plane in Kazakhstan | Deployment on a server in Kazakhstan, SSO, backups, monitoring, maintenance guide | Defined after the diagnostic | Task data stored in Kazakhstan under your control |
| Tracker and CRM link | A won deal creates a project, task statuses flow back to the CRM, shared client context | Defined after the diagnostic | Sales and development see the same client |
We choose the right format during a free basic diagnostic session, once the number of teams, migration volume and required integrations are clear.
Frequently asked questions
Jira suits teams that already live in the Atlassian ecosystem and rely on its integrations. Plane is easier to configure, combines tasks and wiki, and is free in its self-hosted edition. We make the call during the diagnostic based on the process, team size and data requirements.
Yes. We deploy Plane on a Kazakhstan hosting provider's server or in your data center, so the data stays in the country. Jira Cloud stores data in Atlassian regions, and Kazakhstan is not among them.
Self-hosted Plane is free with no user limit. Jira Cloud and Plane Cloud are billed per user per month. Implementation cost depends on the number of teams and the migration scope and is fixed after the diagnostic.
We use Plane's built-in importer: projects, work items, comments, attachments and users are transferred, the result is checked against the import report, and a pilot runs before Jira is switched off.
For one team of up to 20 people, usually 2–3 weeks including the pilot. Migrating a company with several teams from Jira takes 5–7 weeks.
Yes. From Trello and spreadsheets we import tasks, assignees and statuses after mapping them to the new project and status scheme. Tasks from chats are gathered during the inventory, and only the relevant ones are created so the new system does not turn into an archive. Before the old tool is switched off, we verify the result during the pilot.
We define projects, task types (for example features, bugs and tech debt), 4–6 statuses, priority rules and a sprint or cycle cadence. We connect Git so that commits and pull requests are linked to tasks, and build dashboards for workload and deadlines. The setup is tested with one team in a pilot and scaled only after that.
During implementation we usually connect SSO, Git, CRM and messengers so tasks are created and updated where the team already works. The set of integrations is defined at the design stage based on the real process rather than connecting everything at once. For each integration we specify which system is the source of truth.
A self-hosted version needs someone responsible for the server, backups and updates — your administrator or a contractor. We deploy Plane on servers in Kazakhstan, configure the system and hand over the operating and maintenance procedures to the owner. The format of ongoing support is agreed separately.
Yes. Jira Cloud is free for teams of up to 10 users, which is enough to test the workflow during a pilot. If you need process automation, advanced access rights or more users, we move to a paid plan without migrating the data.
